Thursday, 19 June 2025

Air Battle over Kyushu

In the previous post of this series, we "briefly" discussed the fierce air battle over South Kyushu on March 18, 1945. Since then, more details have been found thanks to our good friend Patrice Fresnel. We also dug up quite some information from Japanese sources that put the events of the day into order, at least for the fighter units and the shot down Vought F4U Corsair we saw in the previous post.
Here we go.

From Patrice (original post by Mark Herber):
"18 March 1945 (Lucky Day)
Love Day-14
Seventy-eight years ago today, Carrier Air Group EIGHTY-THREE (CVG-83) made their combat debut.
Essex's first two air groups (Nine and Fifteen) had been initiated with hit-and-run raids on Marcus and Wake Atolls, gaining “lower-stress” combat experience before major operations against the toughest targets. Some aviators of Air Group Four had previous combat experience in North Africa and Norway in USS Ranger (CV-4), and in the Philippines on Bunker Hill before boarding Essex.
But CVG-83's first combat missions were strikes on the Japanese Home Islands...
The new or reformed groups joining Eighty-three on this day were Five (Franklin), Six (Hancock), Ten (Intrepid), and Eighty-six (Wasp)...
By design, and like all of the air groups making their debut, Eighty-three’s compliment was leavened with combat veterans, and they could share their experiences and lessons with the rookies to try and bring them home in one piece...
Approximately 17 percent of the pilots had previous combat experience, most as pilots, and a few as ship’s company on surface combatants. For many—but not all—their first combat after forming as a group about ten-and-a-half months earlier was today. All that training would be put to the test...."

Quoting the VBF-83 Unofficial Memoirs:
"Prior to dawn on 18 March 1945, pilots were undergoing an internal struggle of mixed emotions as they assembled in Ready Room One. Each pilot knew his assignment and each pilot also realized that he was going to parade his might and aggressiveness over the Japanese Homeland. But, he was well prepared and very eager. Spirit was high and the Squadron clowns were having a field day with little digs and witticisms. The Skipper, Lt . Cdr. F. A. PATRIARCA requested order as he gave us a last-minute fight speech and a few words of wisdom. Signal, "Pilots man planes", saw all pilots who weren't flying making a gala appearance on the Bridge to see the Corsairs off the deck and on the way. Our slogan was, "Good luck and good hunting."
...As mentioned for the 17th, tensions for the task force increased the night before, when snoopers located TF 58, and Stembel opened fire before midnight. After a lull, condition one was set in Essex’s at 0305 until 0355, and again at 0452!
The accelerated, aforementioned zipper mission consisting of VF-83’s four-plane night fighter contingent launched around 0415 initiated the day’s sorties. One Night Hellcat had to turn back due to a loose hood (canopy), but the other three headed to Nittagahara Airfield in the dark, arriving and strafing before sunrise. Because of the light (or lack thereof), no damage was assessable by the aviators."

So, the first raid against Japanese positions started at 04:52. Let's see what Japanese sources say about that.
In "The fierce battle of the Japanese Air Force over the mainland - B-29s vs. the Japanese Air Force", Bungeisunju 2001, p.372, Watanabe Yoji mentions:
"The first to penetrate were night-fighting F6Fs accompanying a Type 1 land attack plane [Mitsubishi G4M "Betty"] returning from a reconnaissance mission...In the blink of an eye, the land attack plane ["Betty"] was shot down in night combat."

Following this (from Patrice):
"At 0552, VBF-83's first missions were launched, consisting of a task group (TG) combat air patrol (CAP), submarine CAP (SubCAP), and a fighter sweep to Karasahara, Nittagahara, and Tomitaka airfields. Unfortunately, the mission was fouled up from the get go due to a number of factors, with most of the Corsairs forming up on Lt.(jg) Warren O. Sigman, and only three forming up on Patriarca. Over Tomitaka, the Japanese had aircraft aloft, and some wild dogfights ensued. Eight Japanese aircraft were claimed destroyed. However, Sigman and Lt.(jg) W. F. Garner were missing afterwards.
The first victor was Lt.(jg) James C. Sakellariades, who was taken to the bridge after trapping to shake Rear Admiral Frederick C. Sherman's hand. “The Greek” was so excited with the victory that he hugged the battle-hardened admiral! “Sakes’s” fellow officers in the junior officers' bunk room teased him about hugging the admiral!"

Let's see what Japanese sources say:
""Senshi Sosho #17" mentions that "at 05:50, over Kasanohara [only localy known as "Kasanbara"; not "Karasahara" as mentioned in the previous source], 25 Zeros belonging to the "Sento 312" (312 Fighter Squadron) of the "203 Kokutai" (203 Air Group) took off and fought against F4Us over Kushira and Sakurajima."

In his article in MARU magazine, issue 557, October 1992, CPO Tanimizu Takeo who was with the 312 Fighter Squadron, mentions the following regarding the events of the day:
"As March began, even the previously calm South Kyushu began receiving standby orders. On the early morning of 18 March, while preparing for a reconnaissance mission based on intelligence, at 05:50, the order to form the first line was given simultaneously with the sound of gunfire and flames rising in the direction of Kagoshima. ‘Air raid! Take off!’ I shouted loudly, drawing on my experience from the battlefield. As I later learned, this was due to a surprise attack by enemy night fighters targeting reconnaissance aircraft returning to Kagoshima [Note again the mention of enemy night fighters intercepting Japanese aircraft on a reconnaissance mission]. Immediately, 25 Zero fighters Model 52, which had been on standby, took off.
However, since they were not accustomed to emergency takeoffs as a training unit, three aircraft were severely damaged during takeoff (two crew members were injured). I was on leave for treatment of otitis, so I was excluded from the intercept formation and assigned to ground command. At dawn, I could see two aircraft scattered to the left and three to the right at an altitude of 5,000 to 6,000 metres. I thought we needed to gather quickly and form a formation, so I issued instructions to each aircraft by radio, but they could not gather easily."

From the above it is clear that Tanimizu-san did not fly and did not actively participate in the air combat that day. 
Watanabe Yoji in the previously mentioned book mentions:
"At 5:40 a.m., at Kasanohara Base in Kagoshima Prefecture, Lt Hayashi Yoshihiro, commander of the 203rd Air Group's 312th Fighter Squadron, was delivering a pre-mission briefing before taking off on a reconnaissance mission... All aircraft immediately took off, but before they could gain altitude, the first wave of approximately 150 F4U fighters swept in from above, overwhelming them. Captain Hayashi was hit and parachuted out, sustaining injuries and being taken to the underground bunker at the airfield. For the captain, who had previously served as a squadron leader in a training unit, this was his first aerial combat. He reportedly lamented to his right-hand man, CPO Tanimizu Takeo, ‘If this is how my first battle goes, I'm finished for life.’ "

So, from the above we can conclude that Tanimizu-san did not shoot down anyone that day. The two Corsairs flown  by "Sigman and Lt.(jg) W. F. Garner" were shot down over Tomitaka, so they do not seem to have been shot down by 312 Fighter Squadron Zeros. More about the "Tomitaka Zeros" later.

Moving on (from Patrice):
"By 0630, the first strike was off, consisting of 16 VF, 13 VB, and 15 VT, to hit Nittagahara again. There were three airborne Japanese aircraft in the area, but none approached. Unfortunately, the bombers were rusty and encountered strong (40 knot plus) winds, and results were not what was expected after their months of intense training (and lack of a "warm-up" strike). The pilots had to be impressed to "pick the specific hangar and then a specific nail in its roof."
Sadly, one of the VT-83 Avengers (BuNo 68388), flown by Ens. John L. Kiernan, with gunner William E. Parsons, Jr., ARM3c, lost its wings in a dive--a rare case of a structural failure by a licensed product of the Grumman Iron Works."

"Senshi Sosho #17" mentions that:
"At 06:25, 25 Zeros from the "Sento 303" (303 Fighter Squadron) of the "203 Kokutai" (203 Air Group), split into two groups took off from Kanoya on patrol, when they encountered 15-16 F6Fs ensuing in air battle. The Japanese forces claimed three F6F shot down while admiting to having seven of their own aircraft damaged."

Tanimizu-san remembers:
"Around 0700, a combined enemy fighter and bomber force of approximately 250 aircraft attacked, and our forces engaged in combat with about 30 enemy fighters over various areas including Kushira, Kasanohara, Sakurajima, and Kanoya. The results were one F6F shot down, but LTJG Yabe Yasuji, PO1c Yamaguchi Iwao, and CPO Yukitake Yoshihiro(?) were listed as missing in action. Additionally, during this intercept mission, Squadron Leader Hayashi was hit in aerial combat over Sakurajima, parachuted, but was admitted to the infirmary at Kasanohara Base with burns. The other interceptor aircraft landed at Izumi Base and Kokubu Base, and conducted air patrols over Kagoshima and Kasanohara. No aircraft returned to Kasanohara Base. The enemy's combined fighter-bomber attack destroyed the first barracks and the third and sixth hangars at Kasanohara Base, and fuel drums stored in the open were hit."

Pilots of the 312 Fighter Squadron, in February 1945. The 203 Kokutai was a newly reorganized unit with only a handful pilots having combat experience. Photo credit: MARU #557


Pilots of the 303 Fighter Squadron of the 203 Kokutai, in June 1945. Photo credit: MARU #557

Let's turn our attention to the "Tomitaka Zeros".
Tomitaka Airfield was the base of the "Sento 306" (306 Fighter Squadron) and "Sento 307" of the 712 Kokutai (712 Air Group) a.k.a. "Jinrai Butai", the famous unit equipped with "Ohka". But these fighter squadrons were equipped with Zeros and had altogether 64 aircraft on standby. As of this post, we have not found detailed accounts of the battles of these two fighter squadrons.

The Action Report of VBF83 mentions:
"Course was set for Tomitaka. At 1550 when about 30 miles from TOMITAKA; nine Zekes were called by the sweep leader. They were in 3-3 plane sections, 5000f above. A high speed climb was begun, to even the altitude. They apparently didn't see the F4U’s, as they continued level flight, not maneuvering for better visibility, and drifted away to the south. One bomb that had failed to release was directed at TOMITAKA hangars, while other planes strafed. Rendezvous was begun southeast to seaward. 
Lt. STEVEN’s plane was seen trailing a thin wisp of smoke, apparently having been hit by AA, and here the F4U’s were attacked by 25-30 Zekes. Lt. STEVENS’s plane was taken into the middle of the group and a tight know of weaving and maneuvering planes fought all around him. At high speed, the F4U's were able to maneuver with, and sometimes out-maneuver the Zeke 52’s. For 15 minutes there was continuous action. Lt. STEVENS’s plane was still smoking, and the fight was being maneuvered southward to a submarine position. This was accomplished by pilots who finding themselves on the outer fringe of the fight would rejoin on the south side. The F4U’s were able, because of greater firepower, to either blast or scare, the Zekes off their tails. The F4U pilots, by coming to the aid of one another when Zekes were on their tails escaped with 2 planes damaged by Zeke’s 50 calibre fire. Final score: destroyed nine, probably destroyed four, known to have damaged two….
Pilots feel certain that Lt. STEVENS’s plane was not hit again by Zekes. However, after the engagement, his plane was smoking more heavily. H, had been moved about 15 miles toward rescue sub, and was able to fly another 10 miles before ditching. He was seen to get out of his plane, but did not get his raft out. Three rafts were dropped near by, but he was not seen to have reached any of them. Rescue sub was contacted and given an accurate plot, and Ens. BOULDIN stayed till fuel forced him home. 
An interesting Jap[sic] tactic was observed prior to the ditching. After the fight had been broken off and the divisions were rendezvousing above Lt. STEVENS, the sweep leader remained behind Lt. STEVENS, awaiting the water lending. He looked behind and there at about 1000 yards, slightly above, were 3 Zekes. They made no effort to close, apparently waiting for some choice shots after the ditching. The sweep leader turned directly into them and fired at the leader at long range. They immediately scattered and were not seen again."

Japanese claims and losses:
After the March 18, 1945, air battles the two 203Ku fighter squadrons claimed three enemy aircraft shot down and three damaged. They admited losing: seven Zeros shot down, four failed to return, seven burned on the ground, one seriously damaged, four more slightly damaged and a total of eleven aircraft received hits.
The two 712Ku fighter squadrons claimed 19(!) F4U shot down, five damaged and three unconfirmed. Also three F6F shot down. They admited losing four Zeros shot down, 19(!) failed to return and eight Zeros received hits. 

US claims and losses (from Patrice):
"VBF-83 (flying F4U-1D Corsairs) claimed 18 kills over Japanese aircraft. These kills were claimed by 15 different pilots.... 
In addition to the pilot and air crew losses listed above, two Hellcats (one -5 & one -5N), five Corsairs, and one TBM* were lost."

I'm afraid this a bit confusing to me. So, total eight Corsairs were shot down? Five plus the three (Sigman, Garner and Stevens)?

In conclusion. If the three Corsairs (Sigman, Garner and Stevens) were indeed shot down over Tomitaka, on the "right side" of Kyushu, then they were all shot down by the two 712Ku fighter squadrons, not by the 203Ku fighter squadrons based and operating on the "left side or middle" of Kyushu Island.

Very special thanks to Patrice Fresnel!

Tuesday, 17 June 2025

"Nihongun Rokakuki" #4 - Vought F4U Corsair


According to a Japanese source, the arplane was found having made an emergency landing after being shot down (?) near  Kasanohara Navy Base, in Kagoshima Prefecture, Kyushu, on March 18, 1945. The plane belonged to the VBF-83 fighter bomber unit of the aircraft carrier "Essex" and was flown by Lt. Warren O. Sigman.
The photos are from a vintage, April 1945, publication. 
I was not able to find any mention of "Lt. Warren O. Sigman" except here, quite interesting read about the events of that day.

Our friend Patrice Fresnel added more from facebook group named "Carrier Air Group EIGHTY-THREE (CVG 83)":
 18 March 1945 (Lucky Day)
Love Day-14
Seventy-eight years ago today, Carrier Air Group EIGHTY-THREE (CVG-83) made their combat debut.
Essex's first two air groups (Nine and Fifteen) had been initiated with hit-and-run raids on Marcus and Wake Atolls, gaining “lower-stress” combat experience before major operations against the toughest targets. Some aviators of Air Group Four had previous combat experience in North Africa and Norway in USS Ranger (CV-4), and in the Philippines on Bunker Hill before boarding Essex.
But CVG-83's first combat missions were strikes on the Japanese Home Islands. Probably the only tougher combat debuts were for HornetAir Group at Midway (4 June 1942), Carrier Air Group Ten at Santa Cruz (26 October 1942), and a number of air groups (off the top of my head: Nine, Twelve, Seventeen, Twenty-three, Eighty-two, & Eighty-four) on 16-17 February 1945 against Tokyo!
The new or reformed groups joining Eighty-three on this day were Five (Franklin), Six (Hancock), Ten (Intrepid), and Eighty-six (Wasp). And what a day (or two or three or 79) it would be!!!
By design, and like all of the air groups making their debut, Eighty-three’s compliment was leavened with combat veterans, and they could share their experiences and lessons with the rookies to try and bring them home in one piece. As a refresher, the combat vets in CVG-83 that I’m aware of were:
· CAG-83: Harmon T. Utter, VP-101 in the Philippines (’41-’42)
· VBF-83: Frank A. Patriarca, VS-6 in Enterprise(’41-’42)
· Robert A. Kincaid, served in a DD in the Atlantic Fleet
· William H. Harris, Jr., VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-’44)
· Lindley L. Godson, VF-6 in Princeton, Belleau Wood, and Intrepid (’43-‘44)
· William P. Harris, VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-’44)
· Robert L. Temme, VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-’44)
· George A. Gibbs, VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-’44)
· VF-83: James J. Southerland, VF-83 CO: VF-5 in Saratoga(’42)
· Willard A. Sampson, gunnery officer in Lexington(’42)
· Thaddeus T. Coleman, VF-6 in various CVLs & Intrepid (’43-’44)
· Samuel E. Commella, VF-74 in Kasaan Bay(’44, Operation Anvil-Dragoon)
· George Minar, VF-74 in Kasaan Bay (’44, Operation Anvil-Dragoon)
· James M. Barnes, VF-74 in Kasaan Bay(’44, Operation Anvil-Dragoon)
· VB-83: David R. Berry, VB-5 in Yorktown(’42)
· James T. Crawford, VB-5 in Yorktown (’42)
· Joseph Breslove, VS-34 in the Carribean (’43)
· James A. Riner, VB-8 in Hornet (’42)
· Walton H. Marshall, VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-‘44)
· Guilford N. Ross, VB-17 in Bunker Hill(’43-‘44)
· VT-83: Harry C. White, USS Pensacola(’42)
· James W. Walden, VT-6 in Enterprise and Intrepid(’43-’44)
· John E. Shumway, VT-6 in Enterprise and Intrepid(’43-’44)
· Joe D. Roe, VT-6 in Enterprise and Intrepid(’43-’44)
· William H. Sleepeck, VT-6 in Enterpriseand Intrepid (’43-’44)
· Linus G. Jacobs, VC-29 (’42-’43?)
Approximately 17 percent of the pilots had previous combat experience, most as pilots, and a few as ship’s company on surface combatants. For many—but not all—their first combat after forming as a group about ten-and-a-half months earlier was today. All that training would be put to the test.
As mentioned for the 17th, tensions for the task force increased the night before, when snoopers located TF 58, and Stembel opened fire before midnight. After a lull, condition one was set in Essex’s at 0305 until 0355, and again at 0452!
The accelerated, aforementioned zipper mission consisting of VF-83’s four-plane night fighter contingent launched around 0415 initiated the day’s sorties. One Night Hellcat had to turn back due to a loose hood (canopy), but the other three headed to Nittagahara Airfield in the dark, arriving and strafing before sunrise. Because of the light (or lack thereof), no damage was assessable by the aviators.
General quarters (GQ) was sounded at 0503 due to approaching enemy aircraft. Ten minutes later, Essex had to take evasive action to avoid USS English (DD-696) "which came close aboard the port bow."
During this time, many aviators of the various squadrons were preparing for their first missions. Quoting the VBF-83 Unofficial Memoirs:
"Prior to dawn on 18 March 1945, pilots were undergoing an internal struggle of mixed emotions as they assembled in Ready Room One. Each pilot knew his assignment and each pilot also realized that he was going to parade his might and aggressiveness over the Japanese Homeland. But, he was well prepared and very eager. Spirit was high and the Squadron clowns were having a field day with little digs and witticisms. The Skipper, Lt . Cdr. F. A. PATRIARCA requested order as he gave us a last-minute fight speech and a few words of wisdom. Signal, "Pilots man planes", saw all pilots who weren't flying making a gala appearance on the Bridge to see the Corsairs off the deck and on the way. Our slogan was, "Good luck and good hunting."
At 0552, VBF-83's first missions were launched, consisting of a task group (TG) combat air patrol (CAP), submarine CAP (SubCAP), and a fighter sweep to Karasahara, Nittagahara, and Tomitaka airfields. Unfortunately, the mission was fouled up from the get go due to a number of factors, with most of the Corsairs forming up on Lt.(jg) Warren O. Sigman, and only three forming up on Patriarca. Over Tomitaka, the Japanese had aircraft aloft, and some wild dogfights ensued. Eight Japanese aircraft were claimed destroyed. However, Sigman and Lt.(jg) W. F. Garner were missing afterwards.
The first victor was Lt.(jg) James C. Sakellariades, who was taken to the bridge after trapping to shake Rear Admiral Frederick C. Sherman's hand. “The Greek” was so excited with the victory that he hugged the battle-hardened admiral! “Sakes’s” fellow officers in the junior officers' bunk room teased him about hugging the admiral!
By 0630, the first strike was off, consisting of 16 VF, 13 VB, and 15 VT, to hit Nittagahara again. There were three airborne Japanese aircraft in the area, but none approached. Unfortunately, the bombers were rusty and encountered strong (40 knot plus) winds, and results were not what was expected after their months of intense training (and lack of a "warm-up" strike). The pilots had to be impressed to "pick the specific hangar and then a specific nail in its roof."
Sadly, one of the VT-83 Avengers (BuNo 68388), flown by Ens. John L. Kiernan, with gunner William E. Parsons, Jr., ARM3c, lost its wings in a dive--a rare case of a structural failure by a licensed product of the Grumman Iron Works.
Further strikes and sweeps continued throughout the day. The most notable sweep was the third sweep, in which approximately 54 Japanese aircraft were airborne near Karasahara and Tomitaka airfields. VBF-83 got in another major pitch, claiming another nine victories, with the loss of San Antonian Lieut. James J. Stevens. He was hit, possibly by AA, but perhaps by "UMENO" and "TANIMIZU" in correspondence between Captain Glen Wallace (Ret.) and Henry Sakaida. Stevens’ smoking Corsair was surrounded by “a tight knot of weaving and manuevering planes” whigh “fought all around him.” The furball headed out to sea and ultimately Stevens ditched. He extricated himself from BuNo. 57471, but was swimming slowly. Stevens's division dropped life rafts to him, but he didn't grab any of them, being surely injured. Wallace raised the lifeguard sub, and directed it towards his division leader, but Stevens was never recovered.
Since Wallace had taken so long to return to Wonder Base and delayed recovery operations, he was immediately ordered to the captain’s bridge to explain his actions. Nothing untoward seems to have come from Wallace’s delayed return.
Just over fourteen hours after flight operations began, they ended, with two VF-83 Hellcats, flown by Lieut. Johnny Spotts and Lt. (jg) Charles Hubenthal, diverting to USS Wasp (CV-18) due to low fuel after a TG CAP or SubCAP (sources vary).
Recapping the busy day, during combat on this day, VBF-83 (flying F4U-1D Corsairs) claimed 18 kills over Japanese aircraft. These kills were claimed by 15 different pilots. For the entire air group, 43.4 tons of bombs were dropped, 181 rockets were launched, and over 46,000 rounds of ammunition were fired. A total of 191 sorties were flown in at least six missions. Talk about hitting the ground running!
In addition to the pilot and air crew losses listed above, two Hellcats (one -5 & one -5N), five Corsairs, and one TBM were lost.
Lastly, around the task force, at least three carriers were damaged today: Enterprise (CV-6, a near miss), Yorktown (CV-10, her only wartime damage, which was thankfully minimal), and Intrepid (CV-11; a near miss and damage from an American 5" shell which exploded near her stern).

We will see the events of the day from the Japanese perspective, in the next post.

Sunday, 15 June 2025

"Nihongun Rokakuki" #3 - Douglas B-18 Bolo, Philippines

Douglas B-18 Bolo captured by the Japanese Army in the Philippines.

 I believe it's the same aircraft in the above two photos and a different in the photo below. 
It's interesting to me when I read comments on FB and message boards about how laughably garbage the retractable turret of "Nell" was, while at the same time the same commentators seem to forget that the "Bolo" had one such dorsal turret.
Before you start talking about who "copied" whom: Bolo first flight - April 1935, Nell first flight - July 1935.

According to the original vintage magazine caption, the photo below was taken at Nickols Airfield, while the first three at Clark.

Leave a comment if you know more about these aircraft, like units etc.

Friday, 13 June 2025

"Nihongun Rokakuki" #2 - Martin B-10, Curtiss P-40, Douglas O-46, Philippines


After the capture of Manila, Philippines, in January 1942, the Japanese Army discovered numerous US aircraft—some entirely wrecked, others in fair condition, and some intact. The NHK collection clip features Martin B-10 bombers, Curtiss P-40 fighters, and a wrecked Douglas O-46 captured by the Japanese military, as well as some decoys. 

Some photos of the same aircraft from vintage (1942) publications. According to the NHK caption, the aircraft featured in the clip were found at Nickols Airfield (present-day Ninoy Aquino Airport).
Terry Popravak commented:
In the views of the P-40s, the right side one is a P-40B, with two ports in the wing visible, which were for the two .30-caliber machine guns in the wing, different from a P-40E with three .50-caliber guns in the wing. The left-hand P-40 could be a P-40B too. If I remember correctly, the P-40Bs were all in the 20th Pursuit Squadron at Clark Field when the war began. All the other P-40 squadrons at other locations started out with the E-model.

A photo of one of the Martin bombers featured in the clip. Note the same "37" (?) on the wing leading edge. Other sources mention that the location is Clark Field and based on what looks to be Mount Arayat in the background, Clark Field is the more probable location.

Wednesday, 11 June 2025

"Nihongun Rokakuki" #1 - B-29s, Manchuria - video


Following our series on "captured Japanese aircraft", we will continue with the opposite topic, "Nihongun Rokakuki" (aircraft captured by the Japanese Armed Forces). Since our knowledge of non-Japanese aircraft is limited, we would like to invite "audience participation" to make these posts even more interesting and accurate.
First up is a clip from the NHK collection featuring downed Boeing B-29 Superfortresses during the December 7, 1945, raid against Mukden (present-day Shenyang), Manchuria (present-day northeast China). There are some conflicting reports regarding the success of the raid, and unfortunately, some, I would say,  "embarrassing " details about the unintended side effects of the raid that are not often mentioned. Let's take a look.

From here we read:
"After another training mission to Bangkok on 27 November, XX Bomber Command returned to its aircraft campaign in an attack against the Manchuria Airplane Manufacturing Company at Mukden on 7 December. This was a medium-sized plant, apparently engaged in the assembly of advanced trainers, which the Twentieth Air Force had made a priority target for December and January, but of less importance than Omura, Watanabe, and Tachiarai. A mission against Omura had been set for 3 December, but when the B-29's came up to Chengtu, they found the weather cold there and, according to reports, it was worse at Omura. Day after day, as aircrews and staff waited in impatient discomfort, weather reports brought further postponement. Since his Superforts were spread out at Chengtu like sitting ducks for enemy hecklers and since he got no encouragement from his weathermen, LeMay on 6 December requested permission to try Mukden; Washington's consent came only a few hours before takeoff time on the 7th.
"Field orders had already been cut, and 108 aircraft got off on schedule and without incident. With less difficulty on the way out than in the Omura missions, ninety-one bombers reached the Mukden area to find ceiling and visibility unlimited--that is, outside the planes, for intense cold had frosted the windows to the great handicap of pilots, bombardiers, and gunners. Ten planes in one formation bombed early in the run-in, hitting a rail yard nine miles short of the target. Eighty planes attacked more accurately, scattering 262 tons of bombs in the target area to cause some damage in the factory complex and more in the adjacent arsenal. Nine planes bombed in other areas.
"Japanese defenders again were aggressive, making in all 247 individual attacks on the Superforts. Three collisions were reported: one, unintentional, destroyed the Japanese fighter but merely bent a propeller on the B-29; another, unintentional, destroyed both planes; and in one a damaged fighter took down a Superfort in what looked like a deliberate ramming. Air-to-air bombing, a frequent Japanese tactic, scored a limited success when a phosphorus bomb hit on a B-29 wing and rode piggyback all the way home, burning but without doing serious harm."

warhistory.org mentions a few interesting details:
"B-29s first struck Manchuria three years to the day of Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor. Their anniversary raid was not coincidental but deliberately timed to encourage the more than 1,600 American prisoners of war incarcerated near Mukden. The mission’s tactical objective was destruction of the city’s aircraft factories.
"Of the original 108 Superforts that set out with the XX Bomber Command, no less than 17 were forced to drop out, due to unforeseen problems caused by extremely low temperatures. Inside and outside surfaces of canopies iced over, and the big warplanes struggled, not always successfully, to gain altitude in the thin air. "These worsening conditions forced another 10 B-29s to haphazardly jettison their payloads over a railroad yard long before reaching Mukden, utterly missing this secondary target, before banking away for home base. 
"When the remaining 80 Superfortresses arrived over the city, flight crews found it entirely obscured by a heavy smokescreen. Undeterred, they unloosed their combined 800 tons of bombs, which fell mostly within residential districts, killing about 1,000 civilians, injuring several thousand more. The primary targeted aircraft factories escaped unscathed."
While the raid "was meant as a morale-booster for more than 1600 Allied prisoners of war incarcerated there." and that "For them, the raid would bring hope that the war could soon be over", less-frequently mentioned is the fact that "Tragically, two bombs struck a prisoner of war facility housed within the military installations at Mukden, claiming the lives of 19 detainees and injuring more than 30."

Also, while warhistory.org mentions above that "The primary targeted aircraft factories escaped unscathed." 
"The archives of one of the participating USAAF units, the 25th Bomb Squadron (BS), reveal that... Of the 27 aircraft the 25th BS sent to Mukden, a total of 23 bombed the primary target in two formations; the first 12-aircraft formation released its bomb load from around 6,700 metres (22,000 feet). The strike photos showed the effectiveness of the bombing and also disclosed the beginnings of a smokescreen started by the defending forces; by the time the remaining 11 aircraft of the 25th BS arrived over Mukden approximately 20 minutes later, the targets and the airfield had been completely obscured. Reconnaissance photos taken several days later revealed that the southern edge of the target area had sustained extensive damage, as had a line of hangars on the adjacent airfield." 

This source mentions the B-29s that were casualties in the mission:
42-63363 40th Bomb Group
42-65262 444th Bomb Group
42-6262 444th Bomb Group ?????????
42-6299 462nd Bomb Group, Humpin Honey, was rammed
42-6359 462nd Bomb Group was MIA,
42-65213 462nd Bomb Group "Carlalani" A/C Maj. White, non-combat loss due to heavy icing and plane broke apart.]
42-6389 468th Bomb Group "Party Girl"
42-6390 468th Bomb Group "Gallopin Goose"
42-63395 468th Bomb Group crashed at A-7 returning from Mukden
T-10 might have had a different A/C: William S. Doxey, Capt.
T-29 has a different S/N: 42-24181
42-24745 A-26
42-24693 V-27
Leave a message if you think this list is incorrect or incomplete.

It also mentions:
"The 40th Group got off 26 planes, of which 23 attacked the primary target. Ten planes, however, dropped early on the Suhuton RR Yards. One plane bombed Darien, the secondary target, one bombed Chenghsien, the last resort target, and one Hsuchang, a target of opportunity. One plane of the 40th, 42-63363, was lost on the mission. The 444th sent off 27 planes, of which twenty bombed the primary target and one dropped early Suhuton RR Yards. One plane dropped on Chenghsien  and one on a target of opportunity, Tsingtao[!!!].
"One plane, 42-65262, was MIA and four were early returns The 462nd Group got 23 planes airborne, off which 21 bombed the primary target. Two planes were lost, 42-6299 was rammed and 42-6359 was MIA, and two returned early. The 468th Group was the largest contributor of airplanes, launching 31. Twenty-six bombed the primary, two bombed Darien, one Chenghsien and one bombed Kaishu, Korea, a target of opportunity. One airplane returned early. The 468th reported no losses."

"Chenghsien", Tsingtao, Dalian and Haeju are all locations VERY distant from Mukden but perhaps they indicate the return flight path of the US bombers and the fact that these B-29s failed to release their bombs over Muden and dropped them wherever they could...or something like that. 

Let's see some stills.
This B-29 has been identified as "42-6262" "Round Trip Ticket" of the 444th BG.

The camels are said to indicate that "Round Trip Ticket" had flown supply missions over the Himalayas.

That is a part of the emblem of the 678th Bombardment Squadron (Very Heavy), a cobra head over a spade symbol (here). "Round Trip Ticket" s/n 42-6262 was assigned to the 678th Bomb Squadron, which belonged to the 444th Bomb Group. So the insignia could belong to Round Trip Ticket.

Can you identify the B-29s seen in this still? 

Ed Bailey suggested:
assuming it's also one of the B-29s shot down on the 7 Dec 1944 Mukden raid can only be 42-2699 according to Joe Baugher's serial number list: "[42-]6299 Delivered to USAAF 11Jan44. Assigned to 462nd Bomb Group, Walker AAF, KS
Departed Walker AAF, KS for CBI 10Apr44; arrived Piardoba, India 19Apr44.Assigned to 770th Bomb Squadron, 462nd Bomb Group, Piardoba, India. Named ‘Humpin Honey’
Named ‘Princess Patsy’. (462nd BG) rammed by Ki-44 (Tojo) over Mukden, Manchuria Dec 7, 1944. MACR 10125."
Thank you, Ed.

Last but not least, did you notice the Kawasaki Ki-45 "Toryu" making a quick pass?

Against the US B-29s that raided Mukden, the IJAAF had committed four fighter units: the 104th Sentai lost two pilots flying Nakajima Ki-44 "Shoki" fighters; the 25th and the 81st Dokuritsu Chutai one Kawasaki Ki-45 "Toryu" and one Mitsubishi Ki-46 (Dinah), respectively; one 4th Rensei Hikotai Nakajima Ki-43 "Hayabusa" pilot sustained injuries.
Check here for more on the 104 Sentai.

Monday, 9 June 2025

Kawasaki Army Otsu-1 (乙-1) Reconnaissance Aircraft (Salmson 2) 川崎 乙式一型偵察機 - video


The Otsu-1 was a license built French Salmson 2A.2 by Kawasaki for the Imperial Japanese Army. It first flew in 1922 and Kawasaki built around 300 of this type till 1927. In plane #741 the observer has a movie camera with him.

Monday, 2 June 2025

BRAND NEW sets from "RISING DECALS"

"RISING DECALS" has just released five(!!!) new sets of decals in 1/72 and 1/48. They are mostly for Nakajima Ki-43 "Hayabusa" (Oscar) models but there are some other fighter types as well. Very very interesting sets and a special thank you to Mirek for the review samples!

RD72-113 “25th Hiko Sentai
1/72 Scale, Japanese Army Fighters Used by 25th Hiko Sentai (Ki-43 and Ki-84)
This decal sheet includes 12 camouflage schemes


RD72-114 “59th Hiko Sentai
1/72 Scale, Japanese Army Fighters Used by 59th Hiko Sentai (Ki-27, Ki-43, Ki-61 and Ki-100)
This decal sheet includes 14 camouflage schemes


RD48-038 “Ki-43 over New Guinea and the Solomons” Pt.I
1/48 Scale, Japanese Army Fighter Ki-43 used by 13th, 24th, 59th, 77th and 248th Hiko Sentai
This decal sheet includes 5 camouflage schemes


RD48-039 “Ki-43 over New Guinea and the Solomons” Pt.II
1/48 Scale, Japanese Army Fighter Ki-43 used by 1st, 11th, 24th and 63rd Hiko Sentai
This decal sheet includes 5 camouflage schemes


RD48-040 “Ki-43 over New Guinea and the Solomons” Pt.III
1/48 Scale, Japanese Army Fighter Ki-43 used by 24th, 33rd, 63rd and 59th Hiko Sentai
This decal sheet includes 5 camouflage schemes